Philosophy in writing

Writing is an activity to express an idea or ideas in written form. Objectives to be achieved by a person in writing is highly diverse, such as proselytizing, work demands, to the extent of leisure only. However, certainly by writing one would be able to meet the needs of self-actualization by publishing his writings to be read by the general public. The question is, are people who read our writing  understand what we wrote? Let alone up there, got a simple question like "what people will read what we do not?" It deserves to be contemplated. Posts must be able to provide an understanding for the reader. The idea conveyed by the author will actually be digested by the reader when the writing is in demand by prospective readers. If you are not excited to see it let alone want to read.             This often happens among academics beginners. Once familiar with the terms of academic, academics beginners tend to prefer to embellish his writings with the terms that actually fool the reader. We often meet  terms such as "pragmatism, hedonism, capitalism, idealism" and the other isms, as well as terms from other western that really is an idea that could be discussed in more detail and sometimes it looks cool though in fact if not in terms of meaning a correct order, such as "idealism among students change over the development of pragmatism in the student". we review the sentence above, whether the use of pragmatism there right?. Not at all, in terms of language would be more appropriate to use a pragmatic attitude. Ism affixes representing the meaning of the ideology or ideologies, this term is used to refer to  the philosophy of truth who believes that something be true if it has benefits. The attitude of the scientific-unnaturalness is what sometimes makes writers became proud. In fact, let alone right, to know the concept of the terms used are not. Many amateur writers who use then showcased his writings that contain scientific concepts from western scholars, but not having  any capability in English language. How could this be justified. References that they know very less, like the earlier concept of pragmatism, if we search in Google the English language and its site from the west, then we will find thousands of articles that discussed the concept of Pragmatism. Not to mention other concepts such as hedonism and capitalism. It's pathetic when readers fooled by the writings of such quasi-scientific and philosophical. Recognizing the shortage is a thing to do. High language is not a measure of the quality of writing one. Language and tends to look philosophizing may reflect not the quality the text, and the intricacies of ideas or concepts that are owned by the author. Writing in a relaxed and communicative and dense more acceptable to readers. Make it easier for people to understand your writing, and do tricks or fooling them with things you do not actually know, hate the sight of Allah is very great when we say what we do not know. Write what you know.